NIST FIPS 203 / 204 / 205 are finalized — the migration mandate is now enforceable. CNSA 2.0 · FedRAMP-ready · SOC 2 Type II
Post-Quantum Cryptography · Advisory & Engineering

Quantum-safe cryptography, engineered to standard.

The mathematics that secures the internet has a defined expiry date. QuSafe.ai helps regulated enterprises inventory, prioritize, and migrate to the NIST post-quantum standards — with the evidence auditors and boards require.

Request an assessment Run the risk model FIPS 203 / 204 / 205 · CNSA 2.0 aligned
Standards we implement
Key encapsulationFIPS 203 · ML-KEM
Primary signaturesFIPS 204 · ML-DSA
Backup signaturesFIPS 205 · SLH-DSA
Federal mandateCNSA 2.0
Transition modelHybrid TLS 1.3
The migration clock U.S. guidance deprecates RSA & ECC by 2030 and disallows them by 2035. Every day of delay compounds harvested exposure.
Years
Days
Hrs
Min
Aligned with
NIST · CNSA 2.0 · NSM-10 · OMB M-23-02 · ISO/IEC · ETSI
The attack model

Harvest Now, Decrypt Later

The most dangerous quantum attack doesn't wait for a quantum computer. It has already begun — silently, passively, and with zero indicators of compromise.

PHASE 01

Collect

Encrypted traffic is copied at wire speed across TLS, VPN, and email. Nothing is decrypted, modified, or delayed — collection is invisible from the defender's side.

Happening now
PHASE 02

Archive

Intercepted ciphertext moves into long-term storage — a queryable database of the world's secrets, waiting for the key that doesn't exist yet.

Building for years
PHASE 03

Decrypt

On Q-Day, a cryptographically relevant quantum computer runs Shor's algorithm and the entire archive becomes readable. Retroactively. All at once.

Q-Day
The moving target

The machine it needs keeps getting smaller

Q-Day hasn't arrived — but the resources required to reach it keep collapsing. Estimates of the qubits needed to break today's cryptography have fallen from tens of millions to hundreds of thousands in a few years. The danger has not arrived; the engineering gap is narrowing, not widening.

Timeline showing estimated qubits needed to break cryptography shrinking from about 20 million in 2019, to under 1 million for RSA in May 2025, to under 500,000 for ECC in March 2026 — while the machine still does not exist yet.
Estimated physical qubits required to break RSA / elliptic-curve cryptography, by year of estimate. The machine still does not exist — but the bar it must clear keeps dropping.
Categorically broken

Shor's algorithm ends public-key cryptography

The asymmetric algorithms behind digital identity, key exchange, and signatures share one fatal property: a quantum computer solves them in hours, not eons.

RSA

Broken · no safe key size

Security rests on factoring. Shor's collapses it — larger keys buy nothing. Embedded across TLS, PKI, code signing, and VPNs.

ECC / ECDSA

Broken · smaller target, same flaw

Elliptic-curve keys are compact but more vulnerable, not less. P-256 dominates modern PKI and mobile identity.

Diffie–Hellman

Broken · retroactive risk

ECDH and X25519 establish nearly every encrypted session. Break the exchange and today's captured traffic is tomorrow's plaintext.

The framework every CISO must internalize
X + Y > Q

Mosca's Inequality. If the time your data must stay secret (X) plus the time it takes you to migrate (Y) is greater than the time until a quantum computer arrives (Q) — you are already exposed. Move the sliders to test your organization.

Get a full assessment →
X data secrecy lifetime
15 yrs
Y years to migrate
7 yrs
Q years until quantum
12 yrs
Exposed — act now X + Y = 22 yrs exceeds Q = 12 yrs. Data you protect today can be harvested now and decrypted before your migration completes.

Your sector may already be at acute risk

Mosca's Inequality reads differently in every industry. The quantum clock (Q) is shared — but the secrecy lifetime (X) and migration effort (Y) that determine your risk are yours alone.

Financial Services

Highest risk

Transaction records, settlement systems, and long-lived contracts. Among the most exposed organizations under any realistic quantum timeline.

X secrecy
25+ yr
Y migrate
8–12 yr
Q quantum
~10 yr

Healthcare

Acute today

Patient records must stay confidential for decades. A long X against a moderate migration window puts many systems already over the line.

X secrecy
30 yr
Y migrate
7 yr
Q quantum
~12 yr

Government & Defense

Indefinite X

The relevant question isn't whether you're at risk — it's which classified data has already been harvested. CNSA 2.0 makes migration mandatory.

X secrecy
Indef.
Y migrate
10–15 yr
Q quantum
~10 yr

Technology & SaaS

Design choice

Shorter data lifetimes make this less a crisis than a crypto-agility decision — build hybrid in now, and migration becomes a config change later.

X secrecy
3–5 yr
Y migrate
2–3 yr
Q quantum
~10 yr
This is not a future problem

Quantum-safe cryptography is already written into law

A theoretical result from 1994 is now binding federal policy. The transition is defined by two outer boundaries — and adversaries are not waiting for either.

2024

Standardized

NIST finalizes FIPS 203/204/205. Agencies begin cryptographic discovery.

2027

Convergence

Mandates and infrastructure deadlines hit together across regulated sectors.

2030

Deprecated

RSA, DSA & ECC deprecated for most U.S. federal use.

2035

Disallowed

Legacy public-key cryptography disallowed entirely. Migration must be complete.

Our methodology

Four phases regulators recognize

We deliver the evidence a compliant migration requires — not just new algorithms, but a documented chain from inventory to proof.

1

Discover

A complete, machine-readable Cryptographic Bill of Materials — every algorithm, key, certificate, and dependency, including third-party exposure.

Deliverable: CBOM
2

Prioritize

A four-tier risk model built on Mosca's Inequality, weighting quantum severity, data lifetime, and migration effort.

Deliverable: Risk register
3

Migrate

Hybrid deployment of ML-KEM and ML-DSA — classical and post-quantum in parallel, so a break in either leaves you protected.

Deliverable: Hybrid rollout
4

Validate

Continuous verification and crypto-agility baselining, with audit-ready documentation for CNSA 2.0 and FIPS attestation.

Deliverable: Assurance report
The response · standardized August 2024

The NIST post-quantum standards

Eight years of open, adversarial review produced drop-in replacements built on quantum-hard math. We deploy them in hybrid mode — proven at Google, Cloudflare, and AWS scale.

FIPS 203

ML-KEM

Module-lattice key encapsulation. The replacement for RSA & ECDH key exchange.

FIPS 204

ML-DSA

The primary signature standard, derived from CRYSTALS-Dilithium.

FIPS 205

SLH-DSA

Hash-based signatures — the conservative backup with zero algebraic assumptions.

FN-DSA

Falcon

The compact signature, engineered for the smallest possible footprint.

The platform

Q-Forte — the Quantum Assured InfoSec Platform

Q-Forte orchestrates quantum-safe security across your entire estate — discovery, protection, identity, storage, and collaboration. At its core is ChecQ-AI, our crypto-vulnerability scanning engine that builds your CBOM and PQC migration roadmap, then monitors post-migration compliance.

Powered byQuantum AI Global
01 · Discover & Remediate

ChecQ-AI

A crypto-vulnerability scanning tool that detects quantum-vulnerable cryptography across websites, networks, code, and certificates — building a CBOM and PQC migration roadmap.

  • CBOM & PQC migration roadmap
  • Post-migration compliance monitoring
  • NIST FIPS 203/204/205 aligned
02 · Protect

Q-Sleeve

A quantum-safe security layer wrapping enterprise, web, server, network, cloud, IoT, blockchain, and transaction workloads.

  • Enterprise, web & server security
  • Network, cloud & IoT protection
  • Blockchain & secure transactions
03 · Entropy

QuRNG

A quantum random number generator delivering true, high-entropy randomness as the foundation for quantum-safe keys.

  • Quantum-sourced entropy
  • Stronger key generation
  • Standards-ready integration
04 · Identity

Q-IAM

Quantum-safe identity and access management across authentication, access control, and authorization.

  • Authentication
  • Access control
  • Authorization
05 · Storage

Q-Storage

Quantum-safe storage that keeps data-at-rest protected against harvest-now-decrypt-later exposure.

  • Quantum-safe encryption at rest
  • Long-horizon data protection
  • Policy-driven controls
06 · Collaboration

Q-Collab

Quantum-safe collaboration so shared documents, messages, and workflows stay confidential end to end.

  • Encrypted collaboration
  • Secure sharing & messaging
  • End-to-end confidentiality
Engagements

How we work with you

Fixed-scope engagements that compound — each one produces an artifact your next phase, your auditors, and your board can build on.

Cryptographic Discovery

Full-estate inventory producing a CBOM, mapping every vulnerable algorithm to its dependent systems and blast radius.

4–8 weeks
→ CBOM

Quantum Risk Assessment

Mosca-based exposure scoring across your data estate, translated into a defensible, tiered migration priority list.

3–5 weeks
→ Risk register

Hybrid PQC Migration

Production deployment in TLS 1.3 and PKI — the same hybrid architecture proven at Google, Cloudflare, and AWS scale.

Phased
→ Rollout

Compliance & Assurance

CNSA 2.0 and FIPS 203/204/205 readiness, audit evidence, and crypto-agility baselining for continuous conformance.

Ongoing
→ Attestation

Board & Executive Advisory

Quantum risk framed as business continuity and fiduciary duty — a 10-minute briefing structured around a decision and an owner.

Retainer
→ Briefing
Every other vulnerability has a patch. Harvested traffic does not.
— The case for migrating before Q-Day, not after
2024
NIST standards finalized & enforceable
2030
RSA & ECC deprecated for federal use
2035
Legacy public-key disallowed entirely
~2 KB
Hybrid handshake overhead — operationally trivial
Hybrid post-quantum key exchange already runs in production at
GoogleCloudflareAWSChromeSignal
About us

Cryptography specialists for the post-quantum era

QuSafe.ai is an advisory and engineering firm helping regulated enterprises migrate to the NIST post-quantum standards — before harvested data can ever be decrypted. We pair deep cryptographic research with production engineering: standards-aligned, evidence-driven, and board-ready.

Our team brings together experienced CISOs, CTOs, information security engineers, and quantum cryptography experts — the multidisciplinary depth needed to drive your organization through all four phases of quantum-cryptography preparedness: discover, prioritize, migrate, and validate.

Begin with evidence

Know your exposure before an adversary does.

Start where every compliant migration starts: discovery. In weeks you'll hold a CBOM, a Mosca-based risk score, and a prioritized, standards-aligned roadmap. Everything after that is execution.

Request an assessment

Find out where you're exposed — in weeks, not quarters

Tell us a little about your environment and we'll scope a cryptographic discovery engagement. You'll walk away with a CBOM, a Mosca-based risk score, and a prioritized, standards-aligned roadmap.

  • A scoped, fixed-fee discovery engagement
  • Findings mapped to CNSA 2.0 & FIPS 203/204/205
  • No obligation — a working session, not a sales pitch

assessments@qusafe.ai

Submitting sends your request to assessments@qusafe.ai. We'll reply within one business day — please don't include secrets or sensitive data in this form.